STR
Highlight
Daniela Blettner
Beedie School of Business Simon Fraser U., Canada
Tim Kanis
Technische U. Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
Markus Becker
U. of Southern Denmark, Denmark
Jose Arrieta
U. of Amsterdam, Germany
Jerry Guo
Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Germany
Kyosuke Tanaka
Aarhus BSS, Aarhus U., Denmark
Sebastien Brion
IESE Business School, Spain
Pino Audia
Dartmouth College, Tuck School of Business, United States
Linda Argote
Carnegie Mellon U., United States
John Kim
CUHK Business School, Hong Kong
Yuxuan Zhu
Washington State U., United States
Serhan Kotiloglu
California State U., San Marcos, United States
Thomas Lechler
Stevens Institute of Technology, United States
Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim
Technische U. Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
Based on the theoretical insights of three seminal books - Administrative Behavior (Simon, 1947), Organizations (March & Simon, 1958), and The Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Cyert & March, 1963) - the Carnegie perspective continues to have a profound influence on the study of organizations (Audia & Greve, 2021; Gavetti et al., 2012). A key feature of this theoretical perspective lies in its orientation toward process-oriented models of the firm. Key concepts and mechanisms such as bounded rationality, search, the dominant coalition, and standard operating procedures all share a concern for “how certain events and experiences set in motion processes of decision making, routine development, or routine selection that change organizational behavior” (Argote & Greve, 2007: 338). Although individuals level processes are prominent in these processes, the individuals who populate organizations are treated in abstract terms. One could argue that the implicit idea behind much of the early theory is that individual level differences do not warrant consideration given their minimal impact on the predictions. The objective of this symposium is to highlight some of the recent work done within the Carnegie perspective that couples a concern for process theorizing with a recognition of the influence of individual differences. The studies featured in this symposium build on an emerging new wave of work that has started to highlight the ways in which individual differences expand in important ways the predictive power of some of the central processes within the Carnegie perspective. Recent examples are: Gaba et al. (2023) who examine how the prior experience of managers influences their decisions in response to low performance; Audia, Rousseau, & Brion (2022) who focus on the influence of CEO power on the choice of social comparisons for the evaluation of performance; and Stumpf-Wollersheim et al. (2023) who study the effect of two emotions, sadness and fear, on routine development. Since individuals generally make organizational decisions in teams, we have included in the symposium also projects regarding how individuals prioritize diverging goals in teams and how they form beliefs that become the foundation for shared knowledge systems. To understand how organizations adapt to their environment, we need to understand how individuals make decisions, how individuals interact with each other in teams, and how individual differences contribute to an understanding of the key building blocks underlying organizational adaptation. This symposium offers a broad array of contributions illustrating diverse approaches to the study of these issues.
Author: Yuxuan Lily Zhu – Washington State U.
Author: John Kim – CUHK Business School
Author: Serhan Kotiloglu – California State U., San Marcos
Author: Daniela Blettner – Beedie School of Business Simon Fraser U.
Author: Thomas Lechler – Stevens Institute of Technology
Author: Tim Kanis – Technische U. Bergakademie Freiberg
Author: Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim – Technische U. Bergakademie Freiberg
Author: Markus C. Becker – U. of Southern Denmark
Author: Jose Pablo Arrieta – U. of Amsterdam
Author: Jerry M. Guo – Frankfurt School of Finance & Management
Author: Kyosuke Tanaka – Aarhus BSS, Aarhus U.