OMT
Velvetina Lim
UCL School of Management, United Kingdom
Daniel Levin
Rutgers U., United States
Britt Hadar
Princeton U.
Nir Halevy
Stanford U., United States
Jingze Wang
UCL School of Management, United Kingdom
Blaine Landis
U. College London, United Kingdom
Jingze Wang
UCL School of Management, United Kingdom
Anne Ter Wal
Imperial College Business School, United Kingdom
Alessandro Iorio
Bocconi U., Italy
Yonghoon Lee
Texas A&M U., Hong Kong
Linda Zhu
INSEAD
JeeHye Christine Kim
McIntire School of Commerce, U. of Virginia
Rohit Piplani
U. of Connecticut, United States
Travis Grosser
U. of Connecticut, United States
In recent years, social network scholars have focused their attention towards the behavioral perspective of network brokerage. In this perspective, extant research theorized how and when brokering or other network-related behavior may occur (e.g., Bailey & Levin, 2023; Carnabuci & Quintane, 2023; Obstfeld, 2005; Quintane, Wood, Dunn, & Falzon, 2022), what brokerage behavior looks like (e.g., Batjargal, 2010; Quintane & Carnabuci, 2016), and what strategic tendencies people may have in enacting brokering behaviors (e.g., Grosser, Obstfeld, Labianca & Borgatti, 2019; Halevy, Halali, & Cohen, 2019; Obstfeld, Borgatti & Davis, 2014; Soda, Tortoriello & Iorio, 2018). While scholars have conceptualized brokering behaviors as being distinct to brokerage position (e.g., Stovel & Shaw, 2012), it is assumed that the antecedents and consequences of being a structural broker may apply to agentic attempts to broker. However, this assumption may be erroneous, as those who broker may not necessarily be situated in brokerage positions (e.g., Smith, 2005), and the act of brokering (e.g. tertius iungens) in some circumstances, may even cancel out the brokerage position which suggests lesser benefits received (Kwon, Rondi, Levin, De Massis, & Brass, 2020). Thus, we believe it timely for social network scholars to theorize the cause and effect of brokering behaviors in its own right. This symposium aims to showcase the current research situated in the behavioral perspective of brokerage by asking: What factors may uniquely motivate the act of brokering? Second, what are the consequences in engaging in brokering behaviors? This symposium embarks on a groundbreaking journey through five distinct yet interconnected research streams, delving into the antecedents and consequences of brokerage behavior in networks. Employing a diverse array of quantitative techniques such as experiments and experience sampling methods at multiple levels of analysis, these studies reveal the criticality of brokerage behavior but also mark a paradigm shift in our theoretical understanding of network brokerage when a behavioral perspective is used.
Author: Alessandro Iorio – Bocconi U.
Author: Yonghoon Lee – Texas A&M U.
Author: JeeHye Christine Kim – McIntire School of Commerce, U. of Virginia
Author: Linda Zhu – INSEAD
Author: Rohit Subhash Piplani – U. of Connecticut
Author: Travis Grosser – U. of Connecticut
Author: Daniel Z. Levin – Rutgers U.
Author: Britt Hadar – Princeton U.
Author: Nir Halevy – Stanford U.
Author: Jingze Wang – UCL School of Management
Author: Blaine Landis – U. College London