OB
MOC
CAR
Justine Murray
Harvard Business School
Jennifer Tosti-Kharas
Babson College, United States
Evgenia Lysova
Vrije U. Amsterdam, Netherlands
Yuna Cho
HKU Business School, The U. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Solomiya Draga
U. of Toronto, Canada
Greg Fetzer
U. of Liverpool, United Kingdom
Luke Hedden
U. of Miami, United States
Kai Krautter
Harvard Business School
Yuxin Lin
U. of Arizona, United States
Jordan Nielsen
Purdue U., United States
Shawn Quan
U. of Washington, United States
Justine Murray
Harvard Business School
Benjamin Rogers
Boston College, United States
Sarah Ward
U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States
Molly Weinstein
Northwestern U., United States
Hannah Weisman
Harvard Business School, United States
Jon Jachimowicz
Harvard Business School, United States
Jon Jachimowicz
Harvard Business School, United States
Kira Schabram
U. of Washington, United States
Kira Schabram
U. of Washington, United States
Christopher Myers
Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, United States
Scott Sonenshein
Rice U., United States
Shoshana Dobrow
London School of Economics, United Kingdom
The last two decades have seen a significant uptick in research on meaningful work, defined as work that is purposeful and significant. Prior work has established the link between experienced meaningfulness and positive organizational and employee outcomes, revealed how workers can make their jobs more meaningful, and illuminated numerous downsides of experiencing one’s work as meaningful. Recent reviews highlight that meaningful work has become a central topic in the organizational literature. At the same time, these reviews also highlight several limitations that currently hold the field back, including a predominant focus on calling orientations, an assumption that work orientations are static, a lack of standardized definitions and measures, and limited generalizability. Having now firmly established its place in the organizational literature, we believe it is time to “take stock” of where we are and, with a thought to addressing these limitations in mind, set the foundation for the next generation of meaningful work research. This symposium aims to take a step toward addressing this gap. It features the work of 13 early career researchers whose work begins to build on and move beyond these limitations. Guided by experienced scholars who will act as discussants, we hope this forum will encourage dialogue that will guide and enhance the next generation of meaningful work research. By showcasing diverse methods and topics, we also aim to attract scholars beyond the meaningful work community, fostering new perspectives and integrating them into the field.
Author: Yuna Cho – HKU Business School, The U. of Hong Kong
Author: Winnie Jiang – INSEAD
Author: Lucas Dufour – Toronto Metropolitan U.
Author: Solomiya Draga – U. of Toronto
Author: Greg Fetzer – U. of Liverpool
Author: Elise B. Jones – US Coast Guard Academy
Author: Luke Hedden – U. of Miami
Author: Kai Krautter – Harvard Business School
Author: Wen Wu – Beijing Jiaotong U.
Author: Yuxin Lin – U. of Arizona
Author: Justine Murray – Harvard Business School
Author: Kira Franziska Schabram – U. of Washington
Author: Jon Michael Jachimowicz – Harvard Business School
Author: Jordan Nielsen – Purdue U.
Author: Daniel Goering – Missouri State U.
Author: Shawn Xiaoshi Quan – U. of Washington
Author: Kira Franziska Schabram – U. of Washington
Author: Benjamin Alan Rogers – Boston College
Author: Sarah Ward – U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Author: Vlad Costin – U. of Sussex
Author: Molly L. Weinstein – Northwestern U.
Author: Eli Finkel – Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern U.
Author: Hannah Weisman – Harvard Business School
Author: Haoyue Zhang – Nanyang Business School, NTU Singapore
Author: Stuart Bunderson – Wash U.