The notion of a field continues to be a topic of discussion in organizational scholarship, even after nearly a century of theoretical exploration. Scholars are increasingly acknowledging the importance of addressing both heterogeneity and homogeneity in how participants share issues within a field. In this essay, I suggest a dialogical account of the field, inspired by the work of the late Russian literary scholar Mikhail Bakhtin. I begin by presenting key concepts from Bakhtin’s dialogical perspective, and I show how these concepts can improve understandings of fields’ dynamics. I then describe the field as a dialogical space in which issues are shared in various ways, in terms of degree of concern and controversy. By combining those two dimensions, I identify four broad “zones”: axiomatic, consensual, conflictual, and idiosyncratic. I conclude with directions for future research on field dynamics.