OB
CM
MOC
Zhiying Ren
The Wharton School, U. of Pennsylvania, United States
Lauren Eskreis-Winkler
Northwestern Kellogg School of Management
Luiza Peres
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern U.
Ayelet Fishbach
professor
Nelly Arbel Groissman
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
Eran Dorfman
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
Paul Feigin
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
Anat Rafaeli
Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
Elad Yom Tov
Bar Ilan U.
Einav Hart
George Mason U., United States
Zhiying Ren
The Wharton School, U. of Pennsylvania, United States
Einav Hart
George Mason U., United States
Julia Bear
Stony Brook U.-State U. of New York, United States
Trevor Spelman
Northwestern Kellogg School of Management, United States
Abdo Elnakouri
Northwestern U.
Nour Kteily
Northwestern Kellogg School of Management, United States
Eli Finkel
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern U.
Jennifer Abel
Harvard Business School, United States
Julian Zlatev
Harvard Business School, United States
Conversations addressing conflicts, disagreements, and sensitive topics are instrumental for both individual and team decision-making in organizational settings. Nevertheless, discussions of difficult or sensitive topics are often avoided due to a common misconception that such dialogues diminish decision-making efficiency, exacerbate conflicts, and strain relationships. In this symposium, we present novel research on organizational and interpersonal contexts where people fail to talk about and effectively manage sensitive topics. These topics are often controversial, including the request to initiate a negotiation, changing one’s political views, and engaging with large-scale societal problems through reporting or helping. In particular, the papers presented will show that people (1) overestimate how likely negotiation counterparts are to withdraw a deal if one attempts to negotiate, and as a result, avoid negotiating; (2) overestimate how likely ingroup members are to penalize one for changing one’s mind about controversial political topics, which leads to self-censorship; (3) have conflicting perceptions of victims’ motivations in reporting about similar events, which affects trust and perceptions of accuracy; (4) underestimate the sensitivity and impact of big problems, leading to lower helping; (5) may overestimate the mere effect of apologies on reducing medical lawsuits. Moreover, this set of papers shows the detrimental consequences of such misperceptions, particularly for missed opportunities for disclosure and for economic and relational benefits. Taken together, this symposium highlights the fraught nature of sensitive topics, and points to avenues for improving the effective flow of information within organizations.
Author: Einav Hart – George Mason U.
Author: Julia Bear – Stony Brook U.-State U. of New York
Author: Zhiying Ren – The Wharton School, U. of Pennsylvania
Author: Trevor Spelman – Northwestern Kellogg School of Management
Author: Abdo Elnakouri – Northwestern U.
Author: Nour Kteily – Northwestern Kellogg School of Management
Author: Eli Finkel – Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern U.
Author: Jennifer Abel – Harvard Business School
Author: Julian Jake Zlatev – Harvard Business School
Author: Lauren Eskreis-Winkler – Northwestern Kellogg School of Management
Author: Luiza Peres – Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern U.
Author: Ayelet Fishbach – professor
Author: Nelly Arbel Groissman – Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
Author: Eran Dorfman – Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
Author: Elad Yom Tov – Bar Ilan U.
Author: Paul Feigin – Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
Author: Anat Rafaeli – Technion Israel Institute of Technology